Digital performer 3 v 4.5 ?

Submitted by bluesdudeo on Fri, 01/13/2006 - 08:07

Hi there,

I 've read lots of great reviews via the media and as alway they are very posotive in regard to upgrading. But I was wondering what you people thought of the upgrade ... is it really worth while am I missing out on that much ?

I'm still using 0s9 /dp3 / g4 mac 466 MOTU 2408mk2

I would appreciate any comments from DP users?

Thanks for your time David.

Comments

maintiger

I'm using DP 4.61 with a 2.0 G5 and I could not even imgine goin

I'm using DP 4.61 with a 2.0 G5 and I could not even imgine going back to DP 3- this set up is a lot faster and stable. If you don't use soft synths a G4 dual 867 is a great machine to run DP 4.... with os X and you can get them quite cheap- I used to have a G4 400 and the dual 867 was such a great improvement. the only reason i moved to a G5 is that the soft synths were making the dual 867 real slow. Other than that, i could get as many tarcks as I needed in that thing-

Fri, 01/13/2006 - 08:41 Permalink

anonymous

I'm using DP 4.61 and OS 10.4.4 on a dual 2.0 G5. It's fast and

I'm using DP 4.61 and OS 10.4.4 on a dual 2.0 G5. It's fast and stable for me. The major of my work is VI-based composition, FWIW.

Fri, 01/13/2006 - 11:11 Permalink

gdoubleyou

It's worth it just to get rid of OMS, besides you would gain acc

It's worth it just to get rid of OMS, besides you would gain access to Apple, and othe free AU plugins.

OSX is a joy no more locked up systems.

I have DP on my Mac mini it works well, but it would shine on any G5.

8)

Fri, 01/13/2006 - 11:11 Permalink

bluesdudeo

sorry I posted twice

Fri, 01/13/2006 - 13:50 Permalink

bluesdudeo

Thanks , I'm looking now, :roll:

Thanks ,

I'm looking now, :roll:

Fri, 01/13/2006 - 13:53 Permalink