Skip to main content

My recording setup is so close to comploete all I need is a way to get my signal into the computer. I have a studio projects B1 going into a VTB1 tube preamp, And now I am having a hard time deciding between firewire and PCI, as it seems I think firewire would be a faster clearer connection without all the crappy driver support and whatnot..

Fire wire? or PCI, and if PCI which is the best bang for buck choice?

Tags

Comments

cfaalm Sat, 05/12/2007 - 19:24

FW is very mobile. It will work on both a desktop and a laptop, Mac and PC. A PCI card will not work in a new Mac (it's all PCI-E in there).

I just came back from a gig where I had mLAN stuff working in a live situation with my MacBook. Now that it's all home, I plug it into my Windows desktop and here we go again. Same interface, different computer.

rockstardave Sun, 05/20/2007 - 08:19

nah, you dont want the m.audio interfaces. they are cheap and the software is lame.

last i knew, the mackie onyx satellite was down to $199 -- originally $400!!

for $200 it's a steal... the onyx preamps are pretty fly, and it's firewire which is fly as well.

all in all, the satellite might be your flyest choice

otherwise presonus makes a few firewire interfaces, but i think they are more in the 300-400 range.

goodluck!

Randyman... Mon, 05/21/2007 - 20:54

PCI is superior to Firewire in terms of Latency and reliability/stability. Firewire relies on packet-based transfers, and this adds latency (must cache data to get it into a packet). Thisd also uses a bit of CPU power.

PCI and now PCIe will always be the preferred I/O format for a serious desktop DAW. RME, MOTU, and now SSL and Apogee are players, too :eek: Good stuff

My RME HDSP PCI system runs reliably with 32 sample buffers (that is 0.75ms per buffer - and results in 2.25ms "round trip" latency at 44.1K, or 1.12ms at 96K - besting Apogee's Symphony :P ). That is NEVER going to happen with a Firewire interface...

:cool:

x

User login