Skip to main content

I used to run a G4 Powerbook 1.5Ghz processor, 2GB ram, external FW HD, MOTU 896HD sound card, in Digital Performer 4.5
it was a great setup i admit, but i wasn't pleased with it's "POWER"

I'd be doing a mix of 16 tracks (24/44.1) with with EQ on all 16 tracks, WaveLabs compressors on 8 tracks, reverbs on 4, and NI GuitarRig on two...
and it would choke up.
I was pushing it with the pugins, i know
"Guitar Rig" was the ram killer/sucker
(it sure did a ton more then my older G3 :) so i'm not exactly complaining)

I've been considering getting a new mac.
How are they performing?

with a macbook 2.2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo & 4GB ram,
can I run 8in/8out 24/96 with an independent guitar rig plugin on each channel?

or do i need a MacPro with Two 3.0GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon and 16GB of ram

what kind of processing power are you getting out of your computer?

Comments

gdoubleyou Sat, 12/29/2007 - 19:23

Benchmarks show that the current Core2Duo machines (iMac, Macbooks, and Mac minis) are more powerfull than the last of the dual G5 powemacs.

I have one of the earlier Core Duo mini. No problems with sessions of 32-48 tracks, using vitual instrumens exclusively.

No need to freeze tracks, using Logic8, and recording to an external 7200rpm firewire drive.

8)

redbort Sat, 12/29/2007 - 21:15

Plugins do not run off RAM, they use CPU cycles. Ram is used for samples and the audio program.

^^ is this right?
i always thought plugins ran off ram
what are CPU cycles? is that the processor?

Benchmarks show that the current Core2Duo machines (iMac, Macbooks, and Mac minis) are more powerful than the last of the dual G5 powemacs.

i keep hearing quite the contrary...
especially when it comes to music production..... :keep scratching my head:

tracking clean has never been a problem
it's plugin intensive mixing :?

redbort Sun, 12/30/2007 - 09:15

VonRocK wrote: a cousin with a friend's sister's boyfriend having problems?

you could be my cousin's friend's sister's boyfriend... :!:

found this "shoot out"
http://www.systemshootouts.org/processors.html
doesn't have core 2 duo

& this deals with core duo vs core 2 duo
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/2006/09/imac-core-duo-and-core-2-duo-comparison/

core2duo chips are looking pretty good...
but i don't think i'll get the plugin processing i'm expecting... :cry:

bwmac Sun, 12/30/2007 - 11:17

Someday I would like to compare a mac against my present system so that I could see which one would be better for me. I don't know anything about them but like the post above I see mixed opinions. I here that they are good and don't crash and don't get viruses. I also here that they are limited to what is avalible for programs. I don't use Pro Tools, I use Sonar-6 and I don't think its compatible. I guess I could use both but God thats all I need is another thing to try and learn. LOL