Skip to main content

Okay, so I know that we as musicians can be a tad obsessive compulsive at times, but I seem to be taking the fun out of recording because I am so obsessed about making everything sound as good as I can get it. My question is, I am working on an album where the drum fills at times are just a little bit off...nothing major but I can tell...will people be able to notice this, or should I stop being so obsessed about it and finish the record?

I know you can hide a lot in a mix, but I just don't know if people will be able to tell this or not?

Where do you draw the line from audio perfection and still making the record sound real and not mechanical?

Comments

UncleBob58 Sat, 10/18/2008 - 03:17

Things that are not "perfect" makes for great music. On "Dark Side Of The Moon" the intonation on the guitar is slightly off and one of the notes on the Rhodes piano is out of tune. You can hear all kinds of the minor "flaws" in the great R&B recordings of the 60's, and you can hear all kinds of small "errors" in Beatles recordings.

Art is supposed to be about emotion, and the quest for perfection strips away the human aspect of it.

anonymous Sat, 10/18/2008 - 03:22

UncleBob58 wrote: Things that are not "perfect" makes for great music. On "Dark Side Of The Moon" the intonation on the guitar is slightly off and one of the notes on the Rhodes piano is out of tune. You can hear all kinds of the minor "flaws" in the great R&B recordings of the 60's, and you can hear all kinds of small "errors" in Beatles recordings.

Art is supposed to be about emotion, and the quest for perfection strips away the human aspect of it.

mark_van_j Sat, 10/18/2008 - 19:20

UncleBob58 wrote: Things that are not "perfect" makes for great music. On "Dark Side Of The Moon" the intonation on the guitar is slightly off and one of the notes on the Rhodes piano is out of tune. You can hear all kinds of the minor "flaws" in the great R&B recordings of the 60's, and you can hear all kinds of small "errors" in Beatles recordings.

Art is supposed to be about emotion, and the quest for perfection strips away the human aspect of it.

In other words, if you've recorded the next Beatles, Pink Floyd or Marvin Gaye, don't worry about it. 8)

While I wholeheartedly agree with the above statement it really depends on the root of the 'mistake'. If Mr. Gaye flubbed a note in the ending of the second bridge, no one would really care, because he still had sooo much SOUL. With the Floyd, you we're too busy getting immersed in the moment to listen to that one out-of-tune note on the rhodes... If it's your little cousin's metal band, he's gonna need ALL the help you can give him... :D See what I mean?

Here's what I do... Try to listen to the track in a "big picture" mindset. Put it on, but don't concentrate on it. Look away, clean up the studio, put it on your ipod or car stereo while driving... Distract yourself. If the mistake jumps out, FIX it. If you don't even hear it or notice it, you probably don't need to.

It also helps if you make an estimate of how much time it would actually take to fix it. Most of the time, you can fix it much faster, than contemplating whether or not you should. :)

Davedog Sat, 10/18/2008 - 21:00

I agree with the last post. In deciding what stays, what goes, and what needs fixin in a recording, I ALWAYS listen to a mix in the perspective of "What distracts me from the experience".....If its the drums fill coming in late or sloppy and it jars the mood at that moment, it needs to be fixed.

On the other foot, you can go about this repair business all day and never get down to the basic reason you recorded the stuff in the first place, and that is to complete it as a project and move on to the next thing.

Its these two things all by themselves that require some people to hire a Producer. Someone else who is put in charge of the project and though may be invested, is not so invested as to not be able to say "enough is enough'......PRINT IT Danno!"