Assuming everything is plugged in and set up correctly, how could you not get a good recording? Whether or not the final product will be up to snuff, now that is a different question. What you do to the track after it's on disc has it's own set of possibilities. In other words, it doesn't matter how good the room and the gear are, you can still turn the music into garbage if you don't know what you're doing.
I'm reminded of the line in Blazing Saddles, "What about the people? We forgot all the people!" I think that might be appropriate.
Unfortunately, that line is followed by something like, "You get to work on the dummies. Mongo, follow me." In most recording situations that's appropriate too.
Yeah. That's something I totally missed. I was merely responding to the question of whether or not a good recording could be had. He didn't really make mention if the recording would be music. But, I suppose if you had to factor that in, a lousy band recording on high end vintage gear will sound like a lousy band in hi fidelity.
iamfrobs wrote: [quote=Guitarfreak]So what aspect of recording are you implying that the OP is forgetting?
I think its the performance. (sorry if i mis-understood Bob)
Well, both the performance and the engineering. If you have both the equipment is far less important. If you have neither, the equipment doesn't matter. I guess by saying the microphone is in a good position he is implying good engineering. Maybe someone will argue that an accurate reproduction of a bad performance is a "good recording," but I'd disagree.
Its this point where one ceases to be the engineer and becomes the producer if you're called to that.
With all the engineering in place, the physics of the recording being taken care of, you cannot make a bad technical recording.
You can certainly capture pure crap on tape at any time given the same parameters.
So, if you're not 'producing', it will not matter whether it is a 'good' recording in the purest sense. As long as it is technically done right, it is a 'good' recording.
Although, it is a bit disheartening to go through all that work to get it right only to have no control or effect on the performance.
Comments
Assuming everything is plugged in and set up correctly, how coul
Assuming everything is plugged in and set up correctly, how could you not get a good recording? Whether or not the final product will be up to snuff, now that is a different question. What you do to the track after it's on disc has it's own set of possibilities. In other words, it doesn't matter how good the room and the gear are, you can still turn the music into garbage if you don't know what you're doing.
the settings on the preamp might not be set right?
the settings on the preamp might not be set right?
Stock answer: It depends.
Stock answer: It depends.
I'm reminded of the line in Blazing Saddles, "What about the peo
I'm reminded of the line in Blazing Saddles, "What about the people? We forgot all the people!" I think that might be appropriate.
Unfortunately, that line is followed by something like, "You get to work on the dummies. Mongo, follow me." In most recording situations that's appropriate too.
So what aspect of recording are you implying that the OP is forg
So what aspect of recording are you implying that the OP is forgetting?
Guitarfreak wrote: So what aspect of recording are you implying
I think its the performance. (sorry if i mis-understood Bob)
Yeah. That's something I totally missed. I was merely responding
Yeah. That's something I totally missed. I was merely responding to the question of whether or not a good recording could be had. He didn't really make mention if the recording would be music. But, I suppose if you had to factor that in, a lousy band recording on high end vintage gear will sound like a lousy band in hi fidelity.
iamfrobs wrote: [quote=Guitarfreak]So what aspect of recording a
I think its the performance. (sorry if i mis-understood Bob)
Well, both the performance and the engineering. If you have both the equipment is far less important. If you have neither, the equipment doesn't matter. I guess by saying the microphone is in a good position he is implying good engineering. Maybe someone will argue that an accurate reproduction of a bad performance is a "good recording," but I'd disagree.
Its this point where one ceases to be the engineer and becomes t
Its this point where one ceases to be the engineer and becomes the producer if you're called to that.
With all the engineering in place, the physics of the recording being taken care of, you cannot make a bad technical recording.
You can certainly capture pure crap on tape at any time given the same parameters.
So, if you're not 'producing', it will not matter whether it is a 'good' recording in the purest sense. As long as it is technically done right, it is a 'good' recording.
Although, it is a bit disheartening to go through all that work to get it right only to have no control or effect on the performance.