Skip to main content

it's for studio use, for bass DI and also reamping some stuff



CoyoteTrax Wed, 08/10/2005 - 10:42

The Groove Tubes PDI (passive direct) box streets around $37, is quiet, has a ground lift switch and gets the job done. It's my favorite out of 2 passive DI's I have. The other is a Whirlwind EDB-1 which has a Jensen tranny that I like and you can pick one up on ebay typically for around $15.

But I recommend the GT PDI for $37.

Kev Wed, 08/10/2005 - 13:57

I don't think there is any harm in having a couple of these sorts of units

different is good
simple is good
cheap is good

this does include the B unit

my favourite go to passive DI box is a No-Name unit I bought in my first year of being interested in musical instruments

I have better more expensive units that also include one I have made from expensive parts
why do I choose my little cheapie ??
I don't know
... but I guess it is to do with track record and the need to have some safe proven units that I know I can rely on ... like 57's and 58's

it does saturate a little on bass guitar and I just like it
and always take it with me to a live gig

anonymous Sun, 08/14/2005 - 20:50

AudioGaff wrote: Don't bash me for saying this, but for cheap, it's hard to go wrong with the Behringer DI. Have HAD to use it while helping some wankers a few times now, and it worked just fine. Less than $50

Forgive me for taking so long to reply, it just took me a while for me to pick my jaw up off of the floor!!! :o - I never thought the king of gear snobbery on RO would admit to using Behringer.

I actually use a couple of active Behringer DI's on the advice of an engineer friend, and they have been great. I was inches away from buying a Radial Engineering DI and I am glad I didn't, the Behringers work fine.

Cucco Mon, 08/15/2005 - 04:53

Gaff?? The KING of gear snobbery?? Maybe prince or jester, but KING?? :lol:

I'm gonna jump in and say - not ALL Behringer is bad. Some (okay, most) is, but their DIs, active or passive are actually quite decent. And they're a great price to boot. I keep a couple of both around the studio for just a different flavor.


AudioGaff Mon, 08/15/2005 - 22:34

Yep I admit it. It wasn't my choice to use it, and I did not have any choice in the matter as it was the only thing available, and low and behold, it worked well for the wankers I was working with. A good example that even when a design is stolen and gutted for the most cheapest parts, it still can be decent sounding.

No doubt I'm a big gear snob, but not close to a King Gear Snob. I know many that are much, much worse than I. Some of them are my hereos...

Reggie Mon, 09/26/2005 - 13:27

Kev wrote: a Countryman while very cool ... :)

is not passive
... and might not be so happy in reverse as a re-amp box

I know this is an old thread but......
I'm curious, how do you turn a DI box into a reamp box? I thought they were two different things, unless that Jensen DIY box is special. I have a Radial JDI (passive, Jensen trannie). Is there a trick to use this as a reamp box?

Kev Mon, 09/26/2005 - 14:04

Reggie wrote: I have a Radial JDI (passive, Jensen trannie). Is there a trick to use this as a reamp box?

I don't know this specific unit ... so I don't know which trnsfornmer is fitted.

Before I try to answer this question spend a little while having a look at the Jensen Transformers Tech Notes page.
half way down the page for the section titled
Musical Instrument Application Schematics

passive DI box with most of the typical features

the basic idea in reverse