There shouldn't be a need for overclocking for recording. i3-2100 plenty good enough for ya as far as recording goes.

Of course, the i3 is completely sufficient for audio production. However, installing games on your PC will almost certainly complicate matters as they tend to soak up precious system resources. I can almost guarantee you that you will not get the same performance out of your system. It is never recommended to install games on the same machine running audio applications. Same goes for internet.

Media players like WMP are somewhat negligible as far as CPU load goes, but others, like Winamp, are known to be CPU intensive. Stick to one media player for all playback duties. I use VLC because it's completely stable, easy on the CPU, and it'll play any media, often even corrupt files (while fixing them for you in the meantime).

One tip when it comes to graphics cards. Find one with a heat sink instead of fans. They can be really noisy and there's nothing worse than trying to work with audio when there's a fan (along with all the other cooling wizardry in your tower wizzing in your ear.

Cheers :)

+1 with MoFacta on a number of points. First I definitely agree with keeping your gaming (and internet) usage completely separate from your audio system. Great advice. With the processor, the Core i3 would be sufficient for audio production, no doubt about it. But, IMO, a better option might be the Core i5-2500K. A better processor for not that much more money. I think you can get an i3 for around $120 to $140, the i5 for somewhere just north of the $200 range. If you want a real beast, check out the Core i7-2600K. You can grab one of those for around $300 (give or take).

I also agree with using a fanless video card, the less noise coming from your rig, the better. Another thing to keep in mind when designing your system, is that you want a separate, dedicated hard drive for your audio as well as a separate, dedicated hard drive for your sample libraries. Regular 7200 rpm drives just aren't that expensive anymore, and the performance boost you'll see will be well worth the minor cost increase.

I wouldn't recommend over-clocking your processor when talking about audio production. Not that it can't be done, but it can be a delicate balancing act between the processor, mobo, and RAM involved and many times can cause real headaches. With an audio system, stability should be one of your biggest concerns and over-clocking can be a major hurdle in achieving that.

One other thing that jumped out at me. The main benefit to having a 64bit OS is the ability to use more RAM. Maybe you should think about going with 8GB instead of 4GB.

Just throwing my 2 cents out there...Good Luck!

Wondering....

Hi all,

After reading your posts, i'm wondering if a a 1.8ghz i3 processor would be ok for recording purposes, am i going to get some latency and lagg issues, even if i use a seperate harddrive for the recording?

It would be used with cubase & a line 6 toneport interface.

I would have chosen an i5 but there's a deal on this one PC and it has a crazy graphics card so i'm hesitating!

thanks

gweber: Unfortunately, you mentioned the possibility of using Pro Tools.

The i3 should be ok for the new PT11. It is said to be very efficient of CPU capability.

It is NOT ok for previous versions. Recording is not the problem. Playback is. You will be forced to use large buffers. You will be very limited in instances of cpu-hungry plug-ins like Auto-tune & Eleven. You asked for alternatives.....For PT 10, I am using a Zeon Westmere W3670 (12 HT cores). It is ok for my rather modest sessions but would not be adequate for anything big.

..........also I highly recommend using your workstation for audio only and nothing else. Every (NO exceptions) professional installation that I know of has a dedicated audio computer and a second computer for everything else. The producer is going to want a separate computer anyway so he can surf the web for p*rn while the engineer works.

If I would be a musician and a gamer(which I'm not), I'd buy two more HDD to seperate everything.
A small HDD (possibly a SSD) for recording clean OS
1 big HDD with higher speed (10k or 15k) for Audio data.
The included HDD for games and other possibly hazardous activity..
+ a backup solution if you have customers..

A clean install is the best way to have a stable and trouble free recording experience.

pcrecord, post: 406192 wrote: If I would be a musician and a gamer(which I'm not), I'd buy two more HDD to seperate everything.

Actually that is what I am doing. Most of the time my main audio workstation is completely dedicated....it is not connected to the internet & has no software other than Pro Tools.

But for 10 days each year, I participate in a team competition doing distributed computer protein folding.

[="http://folding.stanford.edu/"]Folding@home[/]="http://folding.stan…"]Folding@home[/]

[[url=http://="http://www.overcloc…"][Official] Chimp Challenge 2013![/]="http://www.overcloc…"][Official] Chimp Challenge 2013![/]

For the competition, I remove my usual HDDs and put in one that has the folding client. After the 10 days, I return to the exclusive audio workstation configuration. This isn't a big deal. It only takes a few seconds to swap drives. After a year of being disconnected, there are plenty of Microsoft updates to do, but that doesn't require any attention so I let it run overnight.