I was working on a song and threw a plugin on one of the vocals. the output was perfert...then I unplugged the plugin and destructively put the compressor on the vocal (altering the wave file) and it came out dull. My question is, is it better to just work with the plugs and not alter the wave file?
Comments
Good reply....so if I track a vocal with very little compression
Good reply....so if I track a vocal with very little compression going in....once I have the wave file Dynamics and everything.....are you saying I shouldn't mess with that vocal destructively? I should just use plugins.
also I use to use gates on all my vocals to get rid of back ground noise (head phones/ other interference type things) but it seems to take "something" away from the feel of the vocal. So im fiquring that I should just treat my booth a little better among other things.
another thining with tracking... should I hear the beat in the back ground ( I know that theres is some bleed but should it be that significant.
You never know when you might want to do a remix or have someone
You never know when you might want to do a remix or have someone else do one, so if you print the compression, you'll have to live with it forever.
Try to kill the bleed at the source. If it's just from headphones, get another pair, or if you're on a budget, try earbuds.
Just as a general rule you should be saving multiple copies of y
Just as a general rule you should be saving multiple copies of your anyways - this is a great habit to get into. Just save your file before making any changes. I will often put a number beside the name of the song. If I have enough room I will date it i.e. Song X - 2005 06 30, If you have multiple saves of the same song on the same day, I add a letter to the end i.e. Song X - 2005 06 30 A, Song X - 2005 06 30 B etc...
Why destructively edit when you don't have to? The only answer
Why destructively edit when you don't have to? The only answer is because you need the CPU cycles.