Skip to main content

I have been setting up a studio over the past few months, and I've got good instruments as well as mics and amps now, but I have a question regarding recording multiple channels at once.

The drum kit for instance, I use at least 5 mics on it and I want to be able to edit all of these tracks individually later on (gates/compressors/EQ) on my laptop, so, what Do I need? 8 channels would be enough, and my laptop does have firewire 4-pins port (not a 6-pins one), first I thought I'd go PCI but then I switched to using a laptop. Perhaps USB is an option too?

Topic Tags

Comments

cfaalm Sun, 12/16/2007 - 12:48

FW 4 pin or 6 pin doesn't really matter when the interface has its own power supply. 8 channels on a USB device would also be possible. The two extra pins are for power.

If you work with a laptop you will need an external HDD to track audio. If you are looking for an external housing the ICY BOX are quite good.

With a USB interface you might want a FW HDD or vice versa. FW is wide enough though to carry 32 channels up and down. So in theory you could even connect both on the FW port.

I'll let others recommend on choices of the interface.

anonymous Sun, 12/16/2007 - 15:35

Ha, Nederlanders boven alles

But your story does confuse me a bit :/. HDD means harddrive in my book and I have a 250GB SATA drive externally but hooking it up to a piece of hardware that, well, turns it into USb 2.0. It should be able to transfer 384Mbit/s if I remember correclty. That should be enough?

Are there perhaps mixers that allow for all channels to be eported individually to USB or Firewire?

moisiss Sun, 12/16/2007 - 21:04

Look for an audio interface for your laptop....

I would look at the FireStudio Project... (http://www.presonus.com/firestudio_project.html)

I have the FirePod, an older version of the Firestudio, ...it works well for me, and is relatively inexpensive for 8 XLR in's. So, you can record 8 mics at the same time to different tracks.

That's just a start though... There are a TON of different audio interfaces. Just go to musiciansfriend.com or sweetwater.com and look in the recording section for audio interfaces.

hueseph Mon, 12/17/2007 - 11:07

The inputs on the Firepod are combination XLR/TRS phono inputs. They're pretty common now on most interfaces. Regarding the Alesis mixers: they are mediocre. At any rate, the mixer is pointless since it doesn't serve as a control surface and I'm not sure the the eq goes to print. (That may be a good thing). Don't cheap out one your interface. As long as it has decent line level inputs, it's one thing you don't want to have to be upgrading constantly.

anonymous Mon, 12/17/2007 - 11:13

Thanks :)

So getting the Firepod would be best? For my purpose of drumrecording I mean. I can see how the mixer would be kindof pointless since I plan on doing everything on the laptop anyway. I won't be using it live. And how would I connect my XLR mics to the XLR/TRS phono inputs?

EDIT: harmony-central shows veeeery mixed opinions. Anyone have personal experiences or other suggestions?

anonymous Tue, 12/18/2007 - 13:40

Ya I mean, as an alternative for the Firepod. I want to consider all the options right. A friend of mine once had this device to which he recorded 6 tracks at once and all the tracks were saved onto the device and afterwards he put the tracks on the computer via USB. Maybe workstation is nog the right name for it but I hope you see what I mean.
Maybe they've got better mic preamps because the Firepod ones seem not to be good, and I've heard of alot of people who had it break down on them. So I'm sortof caught up in the choices here :/

bent Tue, 12/18/2007 - 16:25

I was talking about what your friend had, sorry.

I don't have a Firepod, so I can't really give you any pro's or con's. Presonus, however, is a reputable company (as long as you stay away from the Bluetube :evil: ).

In reading many other posts on the subject of converters, a large number of folks here agree that it's what you use at the front end - before the ADC - and how you manipulate the signal after the fact, that really matters.

bent Thu, 12/20/2007 - 16:31

A preamp and an ADC are two different things that often end up in the same box.

Gear like the Firepod, M-Audio Fastrack, and Digi003 are preamp / ADC combos.

Units like the Digi888, Apogee AD8000, and MOTU24I/O are purely A/D converters.

Others, like the Earthworks 1022, Groovetubes Vipre, and the Focusrite 428 are dedicated preamps.

There are many, many more models and many different variations...

anonymous Fri, 12/21/2007 - 15:06

Hm, that brings me to another point, I was also looking for and A/D converter to use my current mixer with the laptop (because obviously no matter how much I'd like it I can't fit PCI in there) and if the A/D is not that important, this little Behringer pet would do? It's got both balanced and unbalanced inputs and it supports 24-bits/96khz, right. So :p

Because with the christmas holidays coming up I'm planning on making a simple album using a few acoustic stringed instruments, an electric organ and a few parts of the drumset. For which I won't need multitracking to the PC yet, so, something like this would suffice.

Oh, a lot of talking but the question is basically, what's wrong with it that it's so cheap? :p

hueseph Fri, 12/21/2007 - 16:08

bornfidelity wrote: ......if the A/D is not that important, this little Behringer pet would do? It's got both balanced and unbalanced inputs and it supports 24-bits/96khz, right.

That just bugs me. Why do they add this spec? It's idiotic. Are they telling us that this little mixer converts the signal to digital then back to analog again. Another layer of conversion for what? Does the mixer have an SPDIF output? No? Then that little spec is likely just a load of crap.

bent Fri, 12/21/2007 - 16:33

Hahaha!

Ya know, I rarely look at the specs - especially on their gear - and that is the funniest damn thing!
I copied the following from their 1002 Specs .pdf:

2 new state-of-the-art, studio-grade IMP Invisible Mic Preamps with:
- 130 dB dynamic range for 24-bit, 192 kHz sampling rate inputs
- Ultra-wide 60 dB gain range
- Lowest possible distortion 0.0007% (20 Hz - 20 kHz)

And down at the bottom, this statement made me laugh even more:

Conceived and designed by BEHRINGER Germany

:lol:

x