anonymous
27 August 2007
Radial Engineering recently put out the ProRMP, which looks like a cheaper alternative to the X-amp. What are the differences in a passive reamp box and an active one?
Radial Engineering recently put out the ProRMP, which looks like a cheaper alternative to the X-amp. What are the differences in a passive reamp box and an active one?
Radial Engineering lists the differences on the FAQ section for
Radial Engineering lists the differences on the FAQ section for both products. Their claim is that the active X-Amp has better 'reach' (extended HF response), and that the active design is less 'finnicky' about impedance loads, rendering more stable level and tone. There is also an
LED on the X-amp to help set levels.
FWIW, I own a ProRMP, and bought it because it DOES use an isolation transformer. Because I'm using it to...re-amp (hello!!!) sources, I don't usually want full-range 'hi-fi' response. A little bit of HF loss is no big deal, in fact, I've found it desireable. Less 'harshness' in the top end, if you will.
I've been experimenting reamping guitars, trumpets, synths, and bass, and have had no issues with it. It's been a great $100 tool.