Skip to main content

Hey all,

There's a question regarding vox that I've had for a while. I remember the first time i listened
to Def Leppard's Hysteria, particulary the song "animal". I remember thinking "wow, these vox(in the chorus) are lush", almost with a great sense of airyness to them, they almost sound synthy in a way. Anyone know how this was achieved, or "is" achieved. I heard they tracked a whole bunch of "whisper" vox as well as full voice vox. Well, dont know if thats true or not!
(also, i understand that there would have been a sh*t load of processing once the vox were done, but besides that!)

Cheers,

Sammyg

Topic Tags

Comments

Davedog Wed, 12/17/2003 - 07:32

Well, it was Mutt....so anything and everything is possible. My rumour-mill addition to this is, I have read that tracking this record took over a year and Mutt would bring them in to do one note in a passage and it would take as long as it possibly could! This could be why there are NO notes out of place on this and actually all the Def Leppards recordings.

anonymous Fri, 12/26/2003 - 11:56

Hello........well to get the vocals on Animal and other songs
we tracked each harmony about 20 times.the bounced them down to a stereo pair.eq'in along the way....then continued with each harmony,.....usually a 3 part......but we would rebounce the stero pairs to get rid of the bottom end and honk build up......but we would make sure that the intonation was great on each pass..this kind of sound can really only be gotten by having just 2 people sing all the harmonies......some times we would to 20 tracks of one harmony.bounce them down to 1 track..do 20 tracks.....bounce down to 1 track to get the stereo pair...actually now i remember .this was mostly the case....there was a lot of re-bouncing to get the sound we wanted .eq'ing each time..but you cant get tat kind of sound on digital.it just doesnt work
Peace shipley

anonymous Fri, 12/26/2003 - 12:06

BTW.I forgot to add that Mutt would kind of exagerate the enunciation of the words.in an almost animated way...so as to get real character into the parts.and after alot of tracking.......it would sound very different than just singing the part and moving on...you should have seen some of the faces they would make to get certain words to sound a different way!!!!!!.I gotta say tho.that it was a lot of fun to do....
Peace.shipley

anonymous Sun, 12/28/2003 - 16:37

I almost fell off my chair when I saw Mike Shipley's post.

I moved to Sheffield in 1981 aged 13 and became a big fan of local band Def Leppard. I had the honour of being at the front when they played at Sheffield City Hall on the first Hysteria tour. It was the first time they'd played live in Sheffield since Rick Allen's accident. It was a very, very special occasion. I even managed to get one of Rick Savage's plectrums.

Thanks for your post Mike. I always thought it sounded like the lads put a lot of effort into their recordings. You've confirmed that.

Pete.

Hack Mon, 12/29/2003 - 00:39

I have read Walter Afanasieff's method for bgvs. He would have say 4 singers around a mic. Then do passes with all 4 singing the same part, stack that a few times, and repeat this for all the parts. He says this gets different tones out of each singer cause they are in and out of natural and falseto voices to be able to sing each others parts. He quotes the end title song to the movie Hurricane as an example. He says its 4 singers doing all the parts. Its worth checking out, there really is something to this method.

sammyg Mon, 12/29/2003 - 04:11

Hey all,

Thanks for all the help. I've been a fan of that record and its production my whole life so this has helped a lot!

Mike:

Mate, thanks a lot, sounds like a lot of hard work was done, paid off I guess!

HACK: that sound cool, I'll try it!

Peter Lancaster:

Mate....I have footage of that gig! unfortunately I never had the chance to see def leppard in concert, Australia only gets a bunch of decent bands touring once every F*&kn blue moon. It sucks. States and Europe are lucky.

thanks again all,

cheers,

sammyg

anonymous Mon, 12/29/2003 - 12:15

Firstly.......thanks for the welcome.I will stop by here often.it's great to have found this board and I look forward to giving my 2 cents worth .....and learning from people here also......btw.SammyG.....I am also from Melbourne.where do you live in melbourne?
I left and went to England straight after high school.....though I do go back often to see my family
Yes working with Mutt Lange for the past 28 years has been truly amazing....he always wants his records to have a unique sound and achieving that has been an interesting journey......we've had to come up with techniques that were not tried before.....we certainly were not purists .....he would give me so much time to experiment..to create a different sound......any way..thanks again for the welcome
Mike Shipley

RecorderMan Mon, 12/29/2003 - 12:46

Originally posted by ships:
Firstly.......thanks for the welcome.I will stop by here often.it's great to have found this board and I look forward to giving my 2 cents worth .....and learning from people here also......btw.SammyG.....I am also from Melbourne.where do you live in melbourne?
I left and went to England straight after high school.....though I do go back often to see my family
Yes working with Mutt Lange for the past 28 years has been truly amazing....he always wants his records to have a unique sound and achieving that has been an interesting journey......we've had to come up with techniques that were not tried before.....we certainly were not purists .....he would give me so much time to experiment..to create a different sound......any way..thanks again for the welcome
Mike Shipley

That is awesome Mike.
Your defintely in the Top of the tops.

x

User login