Hi folks. I posted this here cos Greg seems to know about this stuff.

Last year on Digi's Pro Tools Forum (and a few here) there was a lot of debate re the claimed benefits of 96kHz. Some people even thought it was some kind of marketing scam, saying 48kHz was fine. (Didn't go for this myself).

I have heard a lot of guys say the music being recorded today punk, rap, pop etc will not take advantage of 96 kHz sample rate.
I tried a few projects at 96k and things sounded better to me
but my machine was overloading.

Makes me want to build a super computer!

What do you guys think, is 96 khz worth it?

Hello there guys...(and girls)

I have to convert tracks from 44.1khz to 48khz:
What's the best way to do it?

Would it be wise to just re-record the whole song with 48khz?

Or should I use a converter, the Pro Tools-Converter for example?

Any advice would be very nice...

merci
putte