That's pretty much true. Nuendo also has networking capabilities and more connectivity for external devices.

It's all on their site.

I found the website to be lacking in details and no comparisons. Anyone else used both?

I think I read a previous post on this exact topic but...

Nuendo can run at 192Khz, and Cubase SX cannot I believe. As David mentioned there is some built in "Network Access" functionality and "File Access" configuration that Nuendo has that Cubase is lacking. Nuendo seems more geared toward Broadcast/TV market and Cubase is more geared toward Audio/MIDI.

I have had a chance to use both and think Nuendo is a bit heavy of an application, yet is still faster that Native ProTools, Cubase SX is my choice for now. I still have PTLe just because it came w/ a stupid M-Box I bought.

The other day I saw someone messing around on Sonar 5 and that looked mean, and i does 192Khz w/ out the high price tag that Nuendo has.

Just a thought,

M.

There isn't the big difference there used to be. I thnk the big differences are that Nuendo has better controller support, 9-pin device support, networking and has the dolby and DTS plug options.

Anyone know the difference between the SX and SL versions?

Now I KNOW that's on the website...

[[url=http://[/URL]="http://www.steinber…"]Cubase Feature Comparison[/]="http://www.steinber…"]Cubase Feature Comparison[/]

T R A C K S H E E T S ! ! !

Why the heck can't I print out track sheets in Cubase? I would think that in any professional type recording software that would be one of the minimum requirements.

You can do it in Nuendo though.

pr0gr4m, that's weird... The Cubase lists 'track sheet' when describing the project menu, but when you open the project men, it's not there (SX 2.0). Odd.