Hey guys...
As some of you know, I have 2 Vintage AKG C-414's with the original Telefunken CK12 Brass Capsules.
These were the capsules that were used in the Telefunken ELAM and the AKG C12 mics. The C-414's also used this capsule until around 1980 or so, at which point they changed to a mylar diaphragm.
The thought occurred to me that neither of these have ever had the brass diaphragms cleaned.
I popped the grills off both sides of both the mics, and the capsules appear to be pretty dirty.
But, they are both currently working, and I know that the general rule of thumb is to not do anything to a mic if it's working.
However, when I say they are both working, I don't know that I could say that they are both working at their optimum.
In the last 6 months or so, I've noticed a drop in output gain ( about 3db down) on one of them, the older of the two ( the 1976 model). I've had to increase the input gain on the preamp(s) when I use this 414, by about this amount, to get a healthy signal.
I don't know that I'd go as far to say that the tone has suffered, it appears to just be a gain thing... but I'm thinking that if the CK12 is dirty, that this would/could effect both the gain and the frequency response for the mic?
I've watched one vid on YouTube, explaining how to clean the diaphragm of a 414, but it's a much later model that is being cleaned. (like an XL)
The instructions involved using isopropyl alcohol and distilled water of varying dilutions.
I talked to Dave Hawk about it ( dvdhawk ) this past week, and he was very hesitant for me to do anything with them, and I won't lie, it makes me very nervous also to think about doing anything to these old beauties.
So... Would you attempt to clean them on your own, using only distilled water and a soft sable brush, or would you bite the bullet and send them to an expert in vintage AKG mic repair?
Thoughts?
Comments
I think I'm going for option 2, and I think I'm gonna go with Ri
I think I'm going for option 2, and I think I'm gonna go with Richard Land, who has been trained at AKG in Vienna in the repairing of vintage AKG mics:
I've just seen this thread, and would agree, that's the right pa
I've just seen this thread, and would agree, that's the right path, Donny. I doubt that dirt on the diaphragm would give a simple 3dB loss of amplitude without extraneous noises (see Rode FoodMic video), but something like a backplate voltage loss could do that. Either way, it probably needs a pro to look at it.
Rather than a diaphragm problem, it occured to me that the backplate voltage is varied according to the pattern set on the switch, so if some of the electronic switches were not operating correctly for your standard position (cardioid?), that could be an explanation.
Boswell, post: 449048, member: 29034 wrote: I've just seen this
Boswell, post: 449048, member: 29034 wrote: I've just seen this thread, and would agree, that's the right path, Donny. I doubt that dirt on the diaphragm would give a simple 3dB loss of amplitude without extraneous noises (see Rode FoodMic video), but something like a backplate voltage loss could do that. Either way, it probably needs a pro to look at it.
Rather than a diaphragm problem, it occured to me that the backplate voltage is varied according to the pattern set on the switch, so if some of the electronic switches were not operating correctly for your standard position (cardioid?), that could be an explanation.
It's funny you mention the pattern set being related to the problem, Bos. I'm seeing the reduction in output on the cardioid setting, but the hyper-cardioid setting is fine... a strong, clear signal.
I'm assuming that this points more towards an electrical issue than the dirty diaphragm?
This article tells me at least three things plus my $0.02 worth:
This article tells me at least three things plus my $0.02 worth:
1). The gold sputtering on mic diaphragms is so thin that perhaps ANY physical contact with the membrane with a brush, etc. could cause "flaking" from the mylar membrane of (especially) an older capsule.
2) The insulation between the membrane and clamping ring(s) may absorb the distilled water or water/alcohol cleaning solution. At hundreds of megohms (or gig ohm) impedance, the water may contribute to "popping" or "squeal" noises when the mic is fired up.
3) Over the years, a stretched membrane (especially mylar, etc.) may lose its tension. Fact of life. There is an electrostatic attraction between the polarized back plate and the grounded or otherwise charged diaphragm. Cleaning won't fix the popping or sputtering found here. The mic owner is probably looking at a new capsule or a reskin done by a reputable tech. Shell out some cash and get your gear working again.
4) Always use a good quality wind screen or wind shield with vocals near condenser mics. Let the vocalists "kiss" an RE20; it's easier (and less expensive) to replace, compared to a Neumann U47, U67, or U87...
5) Use a reputable mic tech when necessary. The capsule may not be the source of all mic noise issues. Certain components in the mic's impedance matching circuitry may be noisy while the capsule is good. Let the mic tech make that call.
DonnyThompson, post: 449049, member: 46114 wrote: It's funny you
DonnyThompson, post: 449049, member: 46114 wrote: It's funny you mention the pattern set being related to the problem, Bos. I'm seeing the reduction in output on the cardioid setting, but the hyper-cardioid setting is fine... a strong, clear signal.
I'm assuming that this points more towards an electrical issue than the dirty diaphragm?
Well, for me, the fact that the hypercardioid levels are normal but the cardioid are low moves the emphasis strongly away from there being a diaphragm issue to there being an electronic issue with the switching of the plate polarisation voltages.
Are you in a position to make relative level measurements for all of the pattern settings? If it's just the cardioid that is low, we might be able to focus the problem more acutely. It would likely still take a trip to an AKG accredited service centre to fix. However, if it turned out to point to a switch chip, there's the chance that could be fixed locally.
We've already talked about the guy I'd send it to, if I wanted i
We've already talked about the guy I'd send it to, if I wanted it done to factory spec.
When AKG had an HQ in Nashville, Richard was the head mic repair guy (nationwide). When AKG consolidated its operations to Northridge, CA, he chose to stay in TN. He'd probably be among the best qualified anywhere, that doesn't have a thick Austrian accent.
Hats off to this guy in the video though, for an exceptional instructional video. Well lit, good audio, and in focus (if not always perfectly in-frame).
Thanks Guys... you've all confirmed for me the wisest move, whic
Thanks Guys... you've all confirmed for me the wisest move, which is to send it out to Richard Land.
I'm not going to risk doing anything myself - and considering it's most likely an electronic issue, I couldn't do it anyway - it's not that I don't understand how to replace a cap or a resistor, but I have neither the hands or the eyes for that kind of detailed work anymore; and, the bottom line is that I don't want to create another problem - or make the current problem worse - which will only result in jacking up the cost of the repair by a specialist.
I'll keep you in the loop on this; for right now, I'm going to have to continue using hyper-cardioid for mono work, until I can afford to send this out. At least it's still operational, it's making no noise that I can hear - there's just that -3db (or so) attenuation on the cardioid switch.
Thanks again for your insight. :)
Donny, Google comes up with very many schematics for the C414, s
Donny, Google comes up with very many schematics for the C414, so, when you have spare time, could you possibly post a link to which one is most likely to represent your problem microphone? I mean simply based on full microphone model number and/or age, and not the circuit details.
The pattern switching appears to be done in a pretty constant way in all the schematics I have looked at, but it would be nice to know.
Donny - I've wrecked a 1st gen NT-1, and a cheap Chinese large d
Donny - I've wrecked a 1st gen NT-1, and a cheap Chinese large diaphragm trying to clean them. I used Colclene - a cleaner I've used for years on other products - the can actually says good for cleaning guided missiles!
The diaphragm on the NT1 was very stained looking - I figured moisture condensed from breath. So I gave it a light spray - the staining didn't shoot so I gave it a closer and heavier burst - and the staining dissolved and washed away and that was the last peep from the mic at the treble end. I can only assume I stretched the membrane as it responded to voices as a low frequency mumble - like when you blow out the corrugations in a ribbon. I tried it on the Chinese mic a couple of years later in desperation, and the similar marks to the NT1 just seemed to have eaten into the surface. The cleaning did nothing for the dull tone, but didn't make it any worse - just not better.
With a precious mic like a 414, I think the money to get an export on it would be well spent. I don't worry about trying it on a cheap mic, but .....................
paulears, post: 456637, member: 47782 wrote: Donny - I've wrecke
paulears, post: 456637, member: 47782 wrote: Donny - I've wrecked a 1st gen NT-1, and a cheap Chinese large diaphragm trying to clean them. I used Colclene - a cleaner I've used for years on other products - the can actually says good for cleaning guided missiles!
The diaphragm on the NT1 was very stained looking - I figured moisture condensed from breath. So I gave it a light spray - the staining didn't shoot so I gave it a closer and heavier burst - and the staining dissolved and washed away and that was the last peep from the mic at the treble end. I can only assume I stretched the membrane as it responded to voices as a low frequency mumble - like when you blow out the corrugations in a ribbon. I tried it on the Chinese mic a couple of years later in desperation, and the similar marks to the NT1 just seemed to have eaten into the surface. The cleaning did nothing for the dull tone, but didn't make it any worse - just not better.
With a precious mic like a 414, I think the money to get an export on it would be well spent. I don't worry about trying it on a cheap mic, but .....................
Paulears.... I may catch flak here, but cleaning any thin membrane is risky, especially condenser microphone capsules and more specifically the double membrane ones such as the Neumann or AKG. I don't use my condenser mics for vocal (only record classical or instrumental jazz). In the event there is a vocal, they get a EV666 or AKG D24E. Considering condenser microphone capsule loading in the 100 meg ohm to 1 gig ohm range, it doesn't take much leakage across insulation to cause noise. Usually, if a capsule becomes noisy or degraded to the point it requires cleaning, it won't be much longer that capsule "circles the drain". Murphy's law says the mic will fail during a paying session. Sometimes the sputtered mylar capsules begin to shed the gold. The other failure mode is insulation breakdown, especially if aggravated by a cleaning compound. Steam distilled water and the finest artist's brush and no pressure on the membrane may work in a pinch, but still risky. Pour a sample of the distilled water in a glass dish and check the resistance with a megohm meter for high or infinite resistance before attempting a cleaning.
Hi guys... Sorry for the delay in responding to this; I've been
Hi guys... Sorry for the delay in responding to this; I've been busy mixing for the last few weeks...
I didn't attempt to clean the mic myself, and haven't yet sent it out to be looked at yet, either.
I've got a list of things I need to do, and only so much money...
I've used the 414 since, and have been adding some top end to it ( a little shelving around 12k by about 2db).
Actually, after I acquired the ISA One pre and was able to get close to matching the impedance, it sounded better, and upgrading to an Apogee converter didn't hurt, either .
I'm sure I'll send it out eventually, just to have it gone over by a pro, someone experienced with vintage mics.
But I'm not gonna touch it myself. I'll let a pro handle it when I can afford to have it done .
:)
If you can afford to replace it, I would try myself. If no, I