...is it better to use a shockmount over a standard mount?
Comments
MadMax wrote: [quote=Guitarfreak][quote=MadMax]All Miking a guit
MadMax wrote: [quote=Guitarfreak][quote=MadMax]All
Miking a guitar cab?
Why on earth not?
I guess because it could interfere with position of the mic. The thing is that a shockmount is always sonically preferable, but is often a PITA logistically. I guess another example is where a singer wants to eat a mic and use the proximity effect. As a short answer, "always" is correct.
Guitarfreak wrote: The thing is that a shockmount is always soni
Guitarfreak wrote: The thing is that a shockmount is always sonically preferable, but is often a PITA logistically.
What do you mean a PITA logistically? You mean like as far as placement goes, and getting it to sit right its a PITA?
Yes and Yes. Depends on the shock mount also and the mic to be shock mounted.
Davedog wrote: [quote=Guitarfreak]The thing is that a shockmount
Davedog wrote: [quote=Guitarfreak]The thing is that a shockmount is always sonically preferable, but is often a PITA logistically.
What do you mean a PITA logistically? You mean like as far as placement goes, and getting it to sit right its a PITA?
Yes and Yes. Depends on the shock mount also and the mic to be shock mounted.
You mean the shocker and the shockee ?
It comes down to convenience IMO. A 57 on a loud guitar amp pro
It comes down to convenience IMO.
A 57 on a loud guitar amp probably doesn't need a shockmount.
An LDC on a cello....probably needs it. You can sometimes flick a cable like 10 feet down the line on a sensitive mic and hear it....if you are recording a quiet source, any bits of handling noise are going to much more apparent.
Guitarfreak wrote: The thing is that a shockmount is always soni
Guitarfreak wrote:
The thing is that a shockmount is always sonically preferable, but is often a PITA logistically.What do you mean a PITA logistically? You mean like as far as placement goes, and getting it to sit right its a PITA?
As Dave said, Yes and Yes. Add to that the fact that they are expensive, bulkier, and more fragile than a mic clip so that I usually take them off and put them in a safe place when I store a stand - while I'll just leave a mic clip on the stand. Overall, there are a ton of little ways that they make a little more work. Still I almost always use them on LDCs or ribbons.
BobRogers wrote: [quote=MadMax][quote=Guitarfreak][quote=MadMax]
BobRogers wrote: [quote=MadMax][quote=Guitarfreak][quote=MadMax]All
Miking a guitar cab?
Why on earth not?
I guess because it could interfere with position of the mic. The thing is that a shockmount is always sonically preferable, but is often a PITA logistically. I guess another example is where a singer wants to eat a mic and use the proximity effect. As a short answer, "always" is correct.
There's the obvious differences between preferences and practicality.
Still... I've used a 57 cobbled into a shockmount for an NT2 on a really rickety/squeeky floor of an old house I tracked a guitar in... the guitar player moving around actually got the mic/stand bouncing a bit.
I agree with the volume/sensitivity issue. The more sensitive th
I agree with the volume/sensitivity issue. The more sensitive the mic...the greater the need for a 'mount. Basically if I'm tracking vocals using any of my condensers...they are shockmounted. If I'm tracking metal guitar parts off a screaming Marshall cab I just go with the regular mic stand mount.
All
All