Skip to main content

hi,

I`ve got a TDM mix system and was wondering whats the best way to deal with the delays you get in a mix on pro-tools (about 4 to 50 ms I think)
Do I have to use TimeAdjuster or not? What about drums, having different plugins on different tracks?

:w:

Topic Tags

Comments

Guest Tue, 01/01/2002 - 14:46

What you have to do is learn how to see the total delay on each channel of the drums - then use time adjuster to make all the delays the same number (the highest) - then there will be no phase problems within a multi mic drum set up (or any other multi mic set up)

Do the same with any tracks recorded with two mic's or a mic and a DI for instance Bass amp + DI..

Hopefully the new Pro Tools (out in Summer) will do this automatically.

Ang1970 Wed, 01/02/2002 - 21:56

At 44.1k, 1ms = 44.1 samples
At 48k, 1ms = 48 samples

With disconnected elements, as little as 1 or 2 ms can affect the "feel" of the timing. With phase, 1 sample moves your mic by about a quarter inch. Some people get their mic positioning down to 1/8 inch accuracy. To them, 40 samples would be a disaster.

anonymous Sun, 01/06/2002 - 01:13

>>Hopefully the new Pro Tools (out in Summer) will do this automatically.

I think there is some misunderstanding as to why TDM plugs are not delay compensated.

The main reason being that they do not interfere with disk access and they work realtime, like in an standalone audio processor or digital console. You can hear your stuff live through the TDM hardware with all the plugins active and that means that when punching in a whole band on a multitrack session you get the same delay whether in direct monitoring or "tape return" like mode.

I am a firm believer that the clear separation in TDM systems between file activity and audio DSP partly accounts for its high stability.

Of course I am waiting like everyone else for a live, fast and clever way to shift tracks to compensate without using the nudge function. But I would not do this while recording. Only when I choose, while mixing.

However the *real* solution is for all plugin makers to go the way McDSP, Sony and others have gone that is having very small latency (around 3 or 4 samples). This may mean going for mix cards or the next generation since I don't know if DSP farms can keep up.
Sure, having more than 300samples latency like Waves C1 is just not acceptable anymore, even if it allows for fancy pre detection of peaks.

my 2 euro-cents

anonymous Tue, 01/08/2002 - 00:43

>>There is no excuse for software that doesn't compensate all of the latency for trackplug-ins All you need to do is offset the playback of the track. No DSP is needed at all.

Of course you have a point and I am waiting for a solution like everyone else, but that only solves half the problem : How do you deal with plugins auditionned live ?
- If you are recording drums and EQ ing on the monitoring, a very common configuration in pop rock studio work, you are stuck unless you want to shift brainwaves in the musicians heads... ;)
- The whole point of TDM is beeing able to work like on a mixing board, something native systems have problem with. They have to resort to all kind of tricks like direct monitoring which is often confusing things even more
To me 3 or 4 samples like good recent plugs is ok and if I really need precise phase relationship then time adjuster will do the trick most of the time.
I have a hunch however that the main reason for the delay compensation not beeing implemented yet in TDM has to do with compatibility with pre-PCI old hardware.

Mark Haliday