Skip to main content

I read somewhere that Royer was introducing some condenser ribbons.
Does anybody have any info?
Fletcher?

Comments

Guest Sat, 10/06/2001 - 04:40

Royer is not introducing a "condenser / ribbon", at least not at this point. Altec / Western Electric came out with a "ribbon / dynamic" mic 40+ years ago, but since then I haven't heard of anyone coming out with a dual 'element' mic.

Royer is coming out with a ribbon mic that has an onboard amplifier that is powered by standard 48vdc phantom power. This does not a condenser mic make.

"Condenser" is another word for 'capacitor', which is how a condenser mic works. As the diaphragm moves, it changes the capacitance in relation to the backplate of the capsule. Royer has no such arrangement in their new product.

hollywood_steve Sat, 10/06/2001 - 07:25

Haven't had the opportunity to use the new Royer yet, but the press releases touts the increased output compared to the original Royer mics. I have had a R121 for a year and a half or so, and, although I have had NO problems due to low output, I could see where increased output could be useful in some situations. One obvious example would be when using the mic at a distance or as an "ambient" mic. Currently, when I use my Royer on low volume sources, I do find myself turning the preamp gain up kinda high, particularly when compared to a modern condensor mic with high output, like a Neumann KM184. I don't know if that is the primary reason for the new mics, but it is one significant reason. With the advent of cheap condensors, even low budget home studios have become used to having high level mic output signals. Personally, I use dynamic mics a LOT in my work, (MD421 more than any other mic), so I am used to working with lower output mics.

Guest Sat, 10/06/2001 - 17:09

Originally posted by Austin Hudley:
How does the sound compare with a standard
Royer ribbon?

A little more consistant from preamp to preamp, with a bit more clarity on the top, and slightly better definition on the bottom.

It don't suck...but I only had it for like minutes...there are only 4 built at this point so it didn't get the usual "workout"...I tried it on a couple of guitar tracks and a vocal...I'm looking forward to having more time to play with the thing...hopefully sooner than later...

atlasproaudio Sat, 10/06/2001 - 18:11

Fletcher,

Do you think that the higher output of the new Royer's will cause the preamp to be more prone to clipping? I find that when using most large diaphram condensers on guitar cab I tend to use a pad between the mic and pre...but with the ribbons the opposite seems to be a benefit for this application (although I can see the benefit for quieter apps). Will they still be making both versions?

Guest Sun, 10/07/2001 - 04:07

I have rarely found myself using an external pad on most mics unless I'm going into a 'fixed gain mic pre' like a Langevin AM-16 or similar, so I'm probably not the right guy for your question.

Yes, it does have a higher output than a typical ribbon mic. No, it's not as ridiculously high an output as the recent Neumann releases, but it does require less M-P gain than a standard ribbon mic.

I reckon it depends on the mic-pre whether an external pad will or won't be necessary.

monty teebaum Sun, 10/07/2001 - 08:10

Originally posted by Fletcher:
I have rarely found myself using an external pad on most mics unless I'm going into a 'fixed gain mic pre' like a Langevin AM-16 or similar, so I'm probably not the right guy for your question.

Yes, it does have a higher output than a typical ribbon mic. No, it's not as ridiculously high an output as the recent Neumann releases, but it does require less M-P gain than a standard ribbon mic.

I reckon it depends on the mic-pre whether an external pad will or won't be necessary.

do you know, do royer modificate (used) 121 to phantom-versions or is the mike a complete new design.

k.w.blackwell Mon, 10/22/2001 - 08:04

Originally posted by Michael Loomis:
Anybody know what the phanton-powered Royers will be selling for. I'm assuming the price will be substantially more than a 121, Yes?

$500 is added to the price of a passive Royer ribbon to get the price of an active Royer ribbon. For the R-121A $1495 vs $995 for a R-121 (list). Likewise for the SF-1[A] you have $1575 vs $1075, and the SF-12[A] at $3175 vs $2150 (2 sets of electronics there).

The active version guarantees you will have enough gain (with any reasonable mic pre) even for quiter sources like acoustic guitar, etc. It also guarantees proper impedence matching that you might not get with an otherwise good mic pre, meaning you get the fullest possible sound. Other than that, you shouldn't expect any sonic tradeoffs between the active and the passive.

For folks who love their Royer and take it with them on the road and plug it into an unpredictable set of mic-pre's over time, the active versions will be exactly what they need. But in the studio, my first impression is that you would be better off buying the passive version and putting the $500 you saved into a better single channel of a decent mic pre that will not only be able to give you the most from the Royer but also allow you to plug other mics into it according to the need of the moment. But that's just the opinion of someone who has no clout in this context, whereas what I said about pricing and sonic tradeoffs were what I heard from John Jennings at Royer.