I am posting this just to piss off Opus! :) (Sorry Gary, I couldn't resist!)

I just read a plausible explaination as to why recording at 96K has merit he may be full of it, but this is what he said:

I have heard a lot of guys say the music being recorded today punk, rap, pop etc will not take advantage of 96 kHz sample rate.
I tried a few projects at 96k and things sounded better to me
but my machine was overloading.

Makes me want to build a super computer!

What do you guys think, is 96 khz worth it?

Hi Brad,

PT looks to go 96k any comments on the SRC needed to get'down' to make a normal CD?

Pitfalls?

Tips?

:)

Jules

OK, the word on the street is that the new 96k Pro Tools with new hardware and improved audio quality throughout the architecture and mix buses will be announced shortly...maybe February 2002. Or maybe I've been in the studio too much and haven't heard the latest.

So, studio owners and engineers, who is interested in this?

Hello all,

This is my first time here and I would very much apreciate a little feed back regarding the 96K Finalizer.

Firstly, let me say I am a Composer and own my own private studio that is operated just for myself.

I have never Mastered before, however my goel is to take all the 2,4 track cassete masters, 1/4 inch and 1/2 8 track masters for Finalizing to DAT.