your post is a bit confusing so i will run through it for you from the top just to be clear.

+4 Vu is a reference level used with professional analog gear. 0VU is equal to +4 [dBm], or 1.228 volts RMS across a 600 ohm load. this is old school telephone company talk.

forget the number. with the Delta 44 set at +4 input level you want to run a test signal up to 0 Vu on the ISA. that signal should reference to somewhere between -22 digital to -16 digital, depending on your interface. different digital interfaces use different reference levels but it usually works out to somewhere between -22 and -16 digital level.

you should be able to push the ISA to 0 or +4 on the meters and still be able to keep peaks well below -10 digital on your DAW with the inputs set to +4.

and while we are at it, the ISA is not a tube pre. it is a solid state with transformers. it's the transformers that you want to saturate to get that "goodness" you are referencing.

btw, ISA, mmmmmm - lucky you!

rock on!

Thanks for the reply Kurt. Reading it just made me realise where I was confuse. The ISA TWO has a DBFS led display. I was originally going for the ISA ONE and in the manual they say you can ajust the leds to so the peak of it match the maximum input you want in your DAW (let's say -12db) The ISA TWO DBFS is not ment to be use that way.

The drivers of the Delta cards has a meter that shows the VU value of the input signal. When I match the output of the ISA to 0VU of the delta (ajusted on +4db), my DAW register -11 -12 on the track input meter And Actually it's also -12DBFS on the ISA TWO !!

But If I run the ISA approaching the peak of the onboard led meters, I need to lower my DAW input because it peaks badly and once I lower the input in the delta, the signal sounds distorted...

I figure I just need to ajust the preamp to the level I want in the DAW cause I figured the numbers match..

I'm I lost or what ? ;)

it depends on how you want to use it. if you want to push the preamps to saturation then turn down the DAW inputs. bottom line has always been do what sounds good regardless of the "rules".

I guess there's a limit to the input the delta card can take. If I push the ISA at -3 -6 dbfs, even with a lower input adjustment that register -12db input in my DAW, the signal is distorted. The output of the ISA is very hot.

Unless I buy atenuators. Would it be worth it ?

no don't do that. just turn down the inputs on the delta.

That's what you don't get, even if I lower the delta input, the signal is distorted.
First wave you see is (-6dbfs on the ISA +4db/0VU on the delta) .. second is (-6dbfs on the ISA and -10VU on the delta) :
  Both signal are distorted

with any ajustments to the delta, I must lower the output of the ISA to -12DBFS to get a clean signal...
I think it's a physical limit on the delta...

Attached files

pcrecord, post: 405435 wrote: That's what you don't get, even if I lower the delta input, the signal is distorted.
First wave you see is (-6dbfs on the ISA +4db/0VU on the delta) .. second is (-6dbfs on the ISA and -10VU on the delta) :
  Both signal are distorted

with any ajustments to the delta, I must lower the output of the ISA to -12DBFS to get a clean signal...
I think it's a physical limit on the delta...

You may have hit the nail on the head. Also be sure you don't have the 30-60 db button pushed on your ISA. Thats a ton of gain and usually will only be needed with older ribbon mics and low output sources.

I haven't use the 30-60db button yet .. no need; the signal is already hot enough with the mics I use.

I just still wonder if I could get a better sound with driving the ISA to higher levels.. I have a Focusrite starlet 6i6 for live purpose.. I'll make some tests with it. to see if it can receive a hotter signal.

why don't you run the delta at -10 dbv. it'll give you more headroom into the card.

It did not work kmetal...

This whole thread is about how better the sound will be if I push the ISA output nearer to it's peak level. But the Delta 44 failed to accept a signal this hot.
So either the delta card can't take this much electricity or the ISA LED metering is faulty.

I just made the test of pluging the ISA to my soundcraft consol and there's no distortion unless the ISA clips...

As I said, it must be a limitation of the delta card. I'll try another I/O soon...

If the 44 is anything like the Delta 1010LT i use to have back in the day, then it is probably the 44. My 1010LT was pretty much garbage when it came to pristine audio. I would distort easily and was very noisy (S/N ratio). You would do yourself a favor by getting a decent card.

Blaumph: Although, better converters is one thing I have on my purchasing list, the ISA was a big step for me (and my budget). I have 4 delta card 2x66 and 2x44, I've been using them for the past 10years and they served me well.. They never distort and the noise floor is not so bad. So I'll wait before I throw them away.
If I don't push the ISA to loud the sound is very clear and warm enough depending on the impedance and mic choice.

The first thing I noticed about the ISA is that I don't need to hard EQ my tracks anymore. While I was sometime doing up to -12db cuts on some tracks, I now hardly need to touch it or go -3db at worst... Good difference!!

All in All I'm pretty happy. I'll let you decide if quality converters or quality preamps comes first ! (y)

It did not work kmetal...

man that's a bummer. what's up w/ the delta i mean, if a pre-amp overloads it at -10, that's just weird. i mean why haven't they distorted before w/ other pre's like from your soundcraft. the isa can't be that hot. and still the discrepancy between the isa meters and the DAW is concerning. there's gotta be a good reason for this. (brainstorming). ugh. bewildered here, have you tried to use the same amount of gain on the isa, and the soundcraft w/ the same source, to witness the the differences?

this whole thing is one reason why i like to have input and output knobs on pre's. digital is so 'scientific w. the levels. the input knob allows the tone to be controlled, while feeding the machine what it wants.

it's cool that your impedence knob does something audible! same kinda idea of pushing into resistence. still, driving a transformer into saturation is cool. i'm stymied that the delta is restricting this. it makes no sense on a technical level.

i use an m-audio fw 1814 at home, and haven't had any issue w/ the converters overloading prematurely, i would bet there are very similar converters/clocking in the devices we use cuz they're from around the same time of production. they're not the best, but functional.

anyway glad you like you pre, i've been eyeballing the 8ch version since it came out, for a drum strip. still, i'm not letting this issue rest (lol), the delta's should not distort, and since they haven't since the new pre was introduced, that's the red flag. can you borrow a buddies interface and see? maybe there is an issue (defect) w/ your pre.?

I intend to test with a Focusrite Starlett 8i6 this week. (I need to put it out of the rackmount I use live first duh..)
Other than the volume matching I also want to compare the A/D converter, since some here seem to have low consideration for the delta 66 / 44

Just to do a follow up, the focusrite scarlett 8i6 wasn't better than the delta 44 card. I tested it and found out there's no real signal level compensation like the Delta (-10, consumer, +4) You must know that choosing +4 actually lower the input volume in order to match units that has +4 outputs. The scarlett has 2 ajustments line and instruments. So with a signal that is not registering on the ISA TWO leds, it was already peaking in Sonar and in the Mixwizard software.

Conclusion ; I seem to be in good shape for the next customer.. I'll plan and querry for better converters when the budget allows it.

Thanks to all for your answers !