Headphones would definitely be a good idea. The monitor outs would probably be bad if it's a powered mixer. It seems to me the tape outs would be your best bet. What interface is it that you are using? You mentioned what it is but knowing th exact product might help.

Oh yeah - its the Vantec USB 5.1 Audio interface which has both a mic-in and a line-in. I bought for trying to record on a laptop.. but my little old laptop wasn't up to the job. The PC I'm using only has the on-board sound chip.. so I've been trying the Vantec.

It may well be that the output of your mixer is just too much for that consumer device. Is there any way to switch the output on the tape outs of that mixer from what I assume is +4dB to -10dB? For what it's worth, you could probably get a cheap usb or pci solution for under $100. Edirol has a very simple usb device that is designed for exactly what you are doing:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000BD1AF0/?tag=r06fa-20

I can't help but think an M-Audio device like this one would be perfect for you though:

http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/Audiophile2496

I had on of those 2496's for a while - it was great to get started with, and should be good for what you are looking for. 8-)

I'll have to check about switching to -10db. If not I'll try the M-Audio 2496. Thanks!!

I think you are right that the USB consumer device can't handle the signal coming from the powered mixer.

just had thought.. I have a small 6 channel mixer. What if I took the Rec Out from the powered mixer and fed it into my small mixer before connecting to the computer line input. Would that allow me to groom the signal down to manageable strength before it hits the computer?

BTW - I did test the USB device with a standard line level signal from a tape deck or stereo receiver and the quality was very good (it didn't peak the meters)

Which powered mixer are you using? And, since Vantech's page links to their documentation does not work, what are the inputs and their respective levels, and does that volume +/- switch control the recording level, as well as output? Perhaps that is dimed and taking an already hot signal and boosting it to the computer? Does it work independently of the software? Bring up the recording program, arm a track, and adjust those levels while running something in? If you have a "Mixer" function in your software, does it move faders for that track? Does it adjust the input level at all, even though it doesn't tie to the software mixer movements?

Let us know?

Kapt.Krunch

ah good point - i hadn't thought of the +/- buttons on the Vantec device. I assumed it was just for playback, but I'll give it a try with recording next time.

I just remembered there was a software mixer program that came with the device. I'll try playing around with those settings as well. (I'd just been adjusting the OS mixer settings).

I'll keep ya posted,
thanks

Oh yeah the specs on the Vantec are few and far between. There is a review here:

http://www.bigbruin.com/2007/vantecaudio_1

The mixer is a Yamaha

Manual at:
http://www2.yamaha.co.jp/manual/pdf/pa/english/mixers/EMX860ST_E.pdf

The specs on the Rec Out jack are as follows:

REC OUT (L, R)
Actual source impedance: 600Ω
Nominal impedance: 10 kΩ Lines

Output level
Nominal: –10 dBV (316 mV)
Max. before cliping: +10 dBV (3.16 V)
Connector type: Phono jack

Here's the blurb on the output jacks:

REC OUT/MONITOR/MAIN (STEREO)
jacks
These are output jacks which send line level signals
from the EMX860ST to external devices. A
stereo recording device such as a cassette recorder
or MD recorder can be connected to the REC
OUT jacks, and a playback device such a power
amp can be connected to the MONITOR and
MAIN (STEREO) jacks. The signals sent from
each jack are as follows.
• REC OUT jacks: The ST bus signal before it
has passed through the MASTER control
and graphic equalizer
• MONITOR jack: The MONI bus signal
which has passed through the Monitor MASTER
control and graphic equalizer
• MAIN (STEREO) jack: The ST bus signal
which has passed through the Main MASTER
control and graphic equalizer
The nominal output level and impedance are
–10 dBV/10 kΩ for the REC OUT jacks, and
+4 dB/10 kΩ for the MONITOR/MAIN (STEREO)
jacks.

- Here's some new info from the manual:

When connecting mics to the powered mixer:
- channels 1-6 are Lo-Z/Hi-Z jack (XLR)
- channels 7-8 are MIC/LINE jack (XLR).

* When connecting a line level device to
channels 1–6, turn on the PAD switch.

---------------------
Pad switch (PAD) (1–6 only)
This switch attenuates the input signal by 30 dB.
When connecting a line level device to channels
1–6, or if the mic input is distorted, turn this
switch on (the pressed-in position).

-------------

So here's where I'm confused;
- it sounds like the Pad switches for channels 1-6 might control the hot signal.
- the problem I had was - in channel 1 (a SM58 mic) was hot and channel 4 (an acoustic guitar plugged directly into the mixer) was hot. Would the guitar be a line level signal? Does the guitar have a DI built into it?

Rimshot wrote: - Does the guitar have a DI built into it?

We don't know. I have an old Harmony that I put a soundhole pickup in, and it's low-level, because it has no preamp. I also have an Ovation and a Taylor of which both contain active battery-powered preamps, and their levels are significantly hotter. They don't have "DI"s, they have preamps, which boost a signal.

I've got a feeling that maybe you just need to do some proper level-adjusting through every stage of the system.

An input signal too low will add noise because you have to turn up something else after it to make up gain. Anything after THAT will pass along the extra noise.

An input signal too high will overload that stage, and everything after THAT will pass along the noise and distortion.

And, if you already have a bad signal, taking that bad signal out to another mixer to feed into a soundcard by attenuating IT will only give you the same bad sound at a lower volume.

It's a juggling act. You need to figure out how to get the first thing a device sees at an optimal level. That means not peaking the meters, and having the channel faders at their optimal levels, which gives a bit of wiggle room for boost and attenuation. And you'll have to adjust the input trim pots...that's what they are for.

Then, with the mixer levels set appropriately, and the outputs set to their nominal settings, (if there is an RCA out level), you have to adjust the input levels of the next device to accept the carefully adjusted signal properly into it. And so on.

And, yes, lose the floor monitors.

Kapt.Krunch

Sage advice! Thanks. I'll check it out.

This is what I get for trying to record 'on the cheap'. I've done this before with other bands (with better equipment i.e a Mackie Mixer and Garageband) and got good results. Its tricky getting the levels right but once it's setup its surprizingly clean.

Oh yes - it is an ovation guitar; with a preamp.

Okay.. I managed to pick up a used m-audio 2496 sound card! Yeeha - this should vastly improve things. Now my other problem..

What do I use to supply 4 headphone mixes, when the powered mixer only has a rec-out (being used to send to the computer line-in)?

Would I take the 2 RCA outputs from the computer sound card (2496) and plug that into some sort of headphone breakout box?

I suppose the signal would have to go through an amplifier before it reaches the headphones.

Or could I plug 2 Y cables into the L/R channels on the amp and plug 2 pairs of headphones into each Y cable?

(Dead Link Removed)

Wow - that's cool - and inexpensive. That will fit the bill.
Thanks!

Just don't expect it to sound awesome, or work for very long.

Search for "Behringer" "quality" on this site if you want to know why...:P

Yeah, but the headphone amps seem to be the one line of "B" products that have a decent reputation. And the price definitely is right...

OH? *sudden spring of interest*
Hey hey, cheapo headphone supply.

Would a computer line out be noisy with this or would I be able to hear the reverb tails above the buzzing, I wonder..

Well I tried out the M-audio 2496 card last night and it worked like a charm. Crystal clear - and no problems at all handling the signal; no peaking at all.
Lots of room to play with..

The only thing I couldn't get to work was the 2496 outputs to play thru the mixer for playback thru the speakers. Odd.. I eventually switched the OS mixer to use the built-in sound device and played it thru that to the mixer.
Maybe a routing problem?

Working on digging up a headphone solution, a bandmate has a friend that apparently has a warehouse full of audio stuff from an old business. So hopefully we'll find something that works.

Rimshot wrote: a bandmate has a friend that apparently has a warehouse full of audio stuff from an old business. So hopefully we'll find something that works.

Where is this magical treasure trove of audio relics?

Glad to hear you got it all worked out.

Hueseph: you've heard of butter mountains.... I'm just imagining badly organised racks of lousy preamps, broken EQs and bits of mixer.

I was thinking more "Raiders of the Lost Radio Shack Storage Facility".