Skip to main content

I need to get a mic for my sutdio to record lead vocals, and maybe other applications, which is better in your opinion or by the specs

Shure ksm27?

or

AT 4040?

or is another mic "better" in this price range

Thanks in advance

Comments

KurtFoster Mon, 07/12/2004 - 11:24

Any of the mics mention will work fine for your budget... Yes they are all slightly different sounding but they all are good pieces ...

Studio projects B1 and C1 should also be considered ...

The best thing you can do is go to a music store and audition all of them then choose the one you like the most ... after all, you have to live with it .

maintiger Tue, 07/13/2004 - 08:32

Or you can try a 58. If you don't have great mic technique (and even if you do!) the 57 will pick up much pops and silibance. The screen in the 58 will help (same mic) if you have a couple of c notes, though, get a Sp C1 or a rode nt1, though. See if you can try them out first and see which one you like best...

anonymous Thu, 07/15/2004 - 01:33

I use a beta87 on stage, and I love it. I just did a gig where they gave me a Beta 58, and that was a very nice mic as well. The sm58 is the standard. I've used it alot and it's passable, but it doesn't really approach the other 2, especilly the 87. In the studio I think I'd like to have a large diaphram condensor, especially since their so reasonably priced. I've got the AT4050 and the KSM44. There the more more upcale mikes in the lines your considering, but I think they might share some of the same characteristics of their little brothers. Generally Audio Technica seems to have more clarity , detail, mabey more prone to sibalance problems. Generally
Shure seems to be a meatier, warmer type of mic. I prefer the KSM44, but I wouldn't give up my 4050. The 4050 can be heard at
http://www.karynwhittemore.com via streaming or broadband. It might give you some kind of clue about the 4040.