Skip to main content

I'VE LIMIT GEAR SO WHAT'S THE BEST WAY TO GO ABOUT THIS. . I'AM STUCK IN MY WEE ROOM. .
THE GEAR THAT I USE . . FOSTEX DMT-8.
BEHRINGER ULTRA-DYNE PRO 9024. ULTRAMIZER PRO.
AND VIRTUALIZER PRO. .MIKES...AKG-D130..
Shure 51SKA. .I GOT TO START SOMEWHERE.
I JUST GET A TINNY SOUND PURE MINCE.
HELP ME HELP ME.
:confused:

Topic Tags

Comments

KurtFoster Sun, 04/06/2003 - 12:12

Sneb,
First, please turn off your "caps lock". :D

I posted this same answer in your other posts regarding the same questions. I will leave the other posts up for a bit today, but I am going to delete all of them except this one to conserve bandwith on the server and to avoid confusion, multiple answers etc.

The ULTRA-DYNE and the ULTRAMIZER appear to be mastering tools to be used at the mix or mastering stage. I don't believe they have mic pres so I doubt if you could successfully plug a dynamic mic into them and achive desireable results. I am not familiar with these pieces, I have never used Beheringer gear, the AKG D130 or the Shure 51 SKA. A search of the AKG and Shure sites showed no information on either of these mics. I cannot speak to these pieces. I did a litte research on the Behringer gear and here is what I have been able to find.

ULTRA-DYNE PRO DSP9024 is a Digital 2-Channel Multiband Compressor/Limiter • Gate • Peak Limiter

The DSP9024 offers six freely definable bands of dynamic processing plus a program-adaptive 3-band exciter, tube emulation and an integrated delay for “look-ahead” parameter adjustment. Interactive signal analysis and unique automatic functions enable you to get results fast, whether you need multiband compression, loudness maximization, de-essing or selective gating.

ULTRAMIZER PRO DSP1400P Digital 2-Channel 2-Band

Loudness Maximizer • Program Enhancer

The digital 2-band concept of the ULTRAMIZER PRO allows separate, program-adaptive compression and limiting for low and high frequencies, ensuring ultimate punch and loudness. Its surround processor and 2-band enhancer give your mixes that extra gloss, while the noise reduction system keeps things clean. Nonetheless, the DSP1400P is a breeze to operate.

Once again, these both appear to be devices for use with mastering, not really suited to tracking of instruments. Pehaps someone else could contribute some useful information? ........ Kurt