Hi all! first time posting here so go easy on me ;) was just wondering if someone could help with a dilemma of mine...

Recently, my Creative X-Fi Platinum refused to record anything from the mic (SM58) without clipping/distortion:

I'm planning on upgrading from PT24 mix to PT192 HD next year. In the mean time, I will be using Sonar for some apps.

Could I use the 192 HD I/O as the interface for Sonar in the mean time?

I recently just purchased a UA 2192 and had a question on monitoring. I have the outputs from the UA going directly into my monitors but the problem is that there is no volume control on the 2192 and it makes it very difficult to work with when tracking or mixing.

I recently just purchased a UA 2192 and had a question on monitoring. I have the outputs from the UA going directly into my monitors but the problem is that there is no volume control on the 2192 and it makes it very difficult to work with when tracking or mixing.

Hi everyone,

I'm looking to upgrade my mixing console in my studio. I want to get a console that is either analog (with firewire card) or digital that supports 192 kHz sampling. So far, I've only been able to find up to 96 kHz (other than the c|24 by DigiDesign, but I'm using Logic and FireWire).

I cannot afford to get Pro Tools HD, I need at least 24 analog out in order to mix outside the box on analog mixer and using outboard gear

so my question is, is MOTU HD as good or nearly as good as PTHD? or at least is it way better thatn using a Digi002?

Thank u so much!

i am recording with MOTU 896 HD's at 24/192, and i want my cousin on the other side of the world to do bass line, we will trade hard drives

question: all tracks on my end- guitar,vocals etc- will be recorded at
24/192, but my cousin can only record the bass at 24/96 as he has older converters

can we do this? we are both using digital performer 5.0

Is there any practical reason for a small, home studio to be using 192khz over say 96, or even 44.1? Is that high of a rate really needed or necessary?

Thanks!

hi,i work with (MOTU 828 mk 2 sound card),i read about MOTU HD 192..is this realy sound like analog?i mean in the past i was working with ADAT,when i listen to my old recrd i fell big gap between this old sound and the sound of 828 !ok the sound of 828 is clear and clean BUT : cold !dont have this deep hedroom as the ADAT. so if someone have hd192 answer me if this realy soundes better?

hey, I recently have been looking to upgrade my converter. i currently have a MOTU 2408mk3. talking to the great guys at sweet water they have suggested 3 cards to me. the Apogee rosetta 800, the Mackie Onyx 1200f, and the MOTU 192hd. all are within my budget but i dont know the best to go for. I mostly Record Metal, and rap(bleh). i have a PreSonus digimax96k preamp and Great River 1nv.