Skip to main content

First off, is there a difference?

And second, I am looking at the PreSonus Firebox, and would like some advice on how to properly use it.

Thanks

Topic Tags

Comments

anonymous Mon, 02/23/2009 - 05:11

Yes there is a difference.

A pre-amp takes a mic level signal and outputs a line level signal. It's the first stage in amplification.
Pre-amps also can offer phantom power to provide power for mics that need it.

An interface is usually a analog to digital converter with some sort of plug you can stick into your computer, firewire or USB.
Interfaces usually have pre-amps built into them, also they can accept line level and sometimes instrument level. They also usually have a digital to analog converter in them so you can play back your music.
Interfaces are all in one units for handling mics, lines and instruments, recording and playing back.

To use the Firebox you buy it, read the manual then install the drivers and software, plug it all in, turn it on and use it.

jg49 Mon, 02/23/2009 - 07:41

The presonus firebox @$250.00> is a great product but it is a firewire interface and I am not certain if your Mac (I'm PC) is firewire compatable. It can record up to six inputs (2 by line level 1/4" or xlr.)Accepts instrument or line level inputs.

Has seperate main and headphone outputs and can produce mixes for monitors and phones. It has zero latency (so playback and recording are fully synched) when using the interface through headphones or monitors.

There are other brands, some that use USB as the connection. All intefaces have a minimum requirement for processor and ram but be aware that is for the interface and the attached software recording programs chew up both.

I am not familiar with Audacity but some will work with almost any software others are more specific.
Post your computers specs and I am certain one of the Apple users can help.

IIRs Mon, 02/23/2009 - 09:24

jg49 wrote: It has zero latency (so playback and recording are fully synched) when using the interface through headphones or monitors.

Latency has nothing to do with syncing playback and recording. If your DAW is set up correctly your recordings will be properly synchronised even when monitoring through your DAW with latency.

anonymous Mon, 02/23/2009 - 12:18

First off, is there a difference?

An interface is an all-in-one recording device, and they usually come bundled with semi-professional recording software (like Cubase LE). A preamp is not what you want right now. An interface is required for good sound, a preamp just polishes the sound (I think that makes sense...). You really don't need more than the ability to record one stereo track at a time, which means you don't really need firewire, but multiple inputs and firewire are certainly nice to have. Just buy a cheap interface.

Codemonkey Mon, 02/23/2009 - 14:30

"A preamp is not what you want right now. An interface is required for good sound, a preamp just polishes the sound"

A standalone preamp polishes the sound when you use it to feed the interface's line level input.

The interface's cheapo preamps are what you really want, and the ADCs will be far superior to your onboard soundcard.

Cucco Mon, 02/23/2009 - 15:26

Huh??
A preamp polishes the sound??? How about, a preamp amplifies the mics lower level signal....
An interface will often *have* a preamp - the quality of which varies.

A good preamp into a sound card may work fine. However, you're likely better off with an interface if this is your first foray into computer recording.

IIRS-
If I'm not mistaken, the comment about latency may have been regarding 0-latency mixes for fold back. When a singer is recording a vocal track and the signal has to go into the software, then back out to the vocalist, it's at the mercy of the system's (system=interface+computer+software) latency. If you can run a low buffer (128 samples or less), you may not have a problem. If you're running high-buffers, you will.

Cheers -
J

hueseph Mon, 02/23/2009 - 16:44

Guitarfreak wrote: also about the thread question, I am just looking for basic how to, levels and stuff, how to set the input volumes and etc.

Wait. I thought you had experience in pro studios? Anyway, the manual. Yes the "getting started" manual is your best friend. And after that, the pdf manual that comes with Cubase LE included with the Firebox. Use the index for specific questions. When all that has finally failed you, this forum or Steinberg.net will be your next resource.

anonymous Mon, 02/23/2009 - 17:19

Huh??
A preamp polishes the sound??? How about, a preamp amplifies the mics lower level signal....
An interface will often *have* a preamp - the quality of which varies.

I meant that a preamp is more of a one-trick pony, and that interfaces come with usable ones anyway, so better to get an interface, because it can do more than just a preamp.

jg49 Mon, 02/23/2009 - 18:40

Where do you live? Is there a GuitCent or something similiar nearby?

Because the best answer to which one is the one thats best for you, is the one you like. The only way to know that is to play around with them.

These units are zebra to elephant, not the same creature at ALL.

There seems to be a point that most posters including Codemonkey, who uses a soundcard to record with, have been trying to get you to look at.

THAT IS AN ANALOGUE TO DIGITAL INTERFACE.

This completely bypasses your soundcard as a way to record audio into your computer.

The Brick is a single channel preamp and will not convert to digital by itself so you will either have to use your existing soundcard (not recommended) or buy an interface that will (more $)

The Presonus is two quality solid state preamps and digital converters bundled with Cubase an extensive DAW platform complete with compressors, reverb, EQ etc.

I know you have Audacity and as I said I am not familiar with it so that might be redundant except that I find it convenient to use Cubase as the Pro Studios I use have Nuendo so anything I do at my project studio can be brought there or vice versa.

IMO and ONLY IMO the Firebox is a better starter kit with the capabilty of making first rate recordings of vocals, guitars, keyboards etc.

But it has to work for you.

Guitarfreak Mon, 02/23/2009 - 18:54

right, I might go try them out. I understand how different they are, and the functions each of them perform. I might start with the firebox for a number of reasons. I also read the sticky where TC says he used Presonus stuff and got demo quality stuff, and when he used the tube pre, his stuff sounded a lot better. That's where this "other" opinion is coming from, just in case you were wondering.

BTW I don't use Audacity, I use Logic Pro. And I'm not really a fan of the fact that the firebox comes with software...just more stuff to worry about, when all i want is a box with knobs.

So in conclusion, I think we all agree that I should start with the firebox then yes? Not that the brick is bad or that I shouldn't get it in the long run, but first things first right?

IIRs Tue, 02/24/2009 - 00:23

Cucco wrote:
IIRS-
If I'm not mistaken, the comment about latency may have been regarding 0-latency mixes for fold back. When a singer is recording a vocal track and the signal has to go into the software, then back out to the vocalist, it's at the mercy of the system's (system=interface+computer+software) latency. If you can run a low buffer (128 samples or less), you may not have a problem. If you're running high-buffers, you will.

Sure. But a properly set up DAW will compensate for any latency so that the recording is lined up correctly with existing tracks. Maybe I misunderstood, but he seemed to be saying that higher latencies would result in misalaigned recordings, rather than just an off-putting delay in the headphones mix.

anonymous Tue, 02/24/2009 - 06:03

It's funny, because from your questions, I think everyone here can tell that you wouldn't even know where to create a new track on Logic if someone didn't tell you first.

Three things:
Don't make up BS stories.
Don't bother using Logic, it's much too advanced for you if you can't even figure out where a mic needs to be plugged in
Don't EVER pirate software.

I think Cucco might have something to say about it. He works for the CIA, the NSA, the NAACP, the PHP and the HTML.

Don't be a tool.

MightyFaulk Tue, 02/24/2009 - 13:20

what's nice about most "FireWire Interfaces" (really an AD/DA converter) is that they incorporate microphone preamps right into the design. Now we aren't talking top of the line pres here, but definitely a great way to learn about pres and line level inputs and all the fun stuff. Heck, most even have a high impedance jack to DI some bass guitar riffs.

anonymous Thu, 02/26/2009 - 18:56

Odds are very strong in my favor when I guess that the presonus's ADC will be vastly superior to what your soundcard can provide. Even in spite of the fact that the Brick may (or may not!) offer a better signal than the presonus's in's will, if you're passing the Brick through a crappy soundcard then all of that work is negated entirely.

You have a better bet with getting an interface with pre-amps and phantom power (if you get a condenser mic one day) than letting a consumer audio soundcard do work that it wasn't designed to do. Then just build up from there, you'll get some mileage out of your interface as long as you focus on its strengths, instead of forcing yourself to deal with its weaknesses on a daily basis.

Oh, FYI... if you were going to spend $400 on a Brick, I would strongly consider looking at the Focusrite Saffire Pro 40 for $100 more. Good brand, good ADCs, good pre's and plenty of room to expand. Just my $.02...

BobRogers Fri, 02/27/2009 - 03:04

I also like the Brick as a DI for acoustic electric guitars. (Particularly Taylors) I use it live (gotta find a better way to pack it up) and I always put the guitar through it when I'm recording a band live in the studio. I've often found that track more useful than the miced guitar (with lots of bleed). So its got a few tricks.

hueseph Fri, 02/27/2009 - 06:08

Guitarfreak wrote: [quote=BDM]which interface did your friend keep? did he keep it to use with his new pro tools?

I'm not sure, I've never heard him mention one, but it is Logic Express I believe, so does that make a difference?it does but only because you need a digidesign or M-Audio interface to use ProTools LE.

x

User login