Skip to main content

Hello,

I want to buy the http://www.rodemic…"]RODE Podcaster[/]="http://www.rodemic…"]RODE Podcaster[/] microphone. The specification said that it has built-in pop filter.

But I am not sure whether it is enough or not. Should I buy an outer pop filter as well? Or can I rely on the built-in pop filter?

Thanks in advance.

Comments

BobRogers Mon, 02/25/2008 - 04:36

I suppose that anything designed to filter plotives affects the audio quality in some way, but pop filters are pretty darned transparent. Putting an external pop filter on a mic with an internal filter is done all time. If you feel the mic is good for your situation, I'd just get it and see if you have problems with popping your p's. If you do, you can experiment with filters (and work on you vocal technique).

RemyRAD Mon, 02/25/2008 - 14:47

Personally, I prefer foam pop filters for handheld rock-and-roll PA microphones.

I think foam pop filters are also perfectly fine especially for use on spoken word, broadcast/podcast announcer work. The 1/2 DB loss at 15kHz just is not a factor to be concerned with. In fact, I find it useful for spoken word purposes.

I like the nylon stocking/embroidery hoop, aluminum punched frying pan splatter screen lids (Stedman high-priced for writing) to be better on singers in the studio. Because it is truly an external device, it really allows you to position the respective talent from a preset distance of your choosing. That way, they can't get too close. Whereas a piece of foam reduces that distance to less than 1 inch on average. With the screen, the performer is typically 3 to 8 inches from the actual microphone capsule. Not completely applicable or feasible for close proximity announcer/interview radio use.

Foam can also be used to prevent pregnancy. Remember kids, always put a condom on your microphone especially in the rain.
Ms. Remy Ann David

x

User login