Hi guys, i have an old ADAT model and a digi 001 and i want to know which converters would you prefer. I heard there are some differences between ADAT models, in that case could you specify which model are you tlaking about.
Thak you in advance. eFe

I own 2 Aardvark Q10's which I use on my Dell computer. They have their own A/D converters rated at 24 bits 96khz. I keep reading the great raves the Apogee system )like the Rosetta) keep getting from everyone. They have the same sampling rate as the Q10, but an Apogee system cost like 3 tiems the price of the Aardvark Q10. Any of you have any suggestions ? should I keep my Q10's ?

Hello, could anyone please give me their thoughts on the quality of the Crane Song HEDD converters? How do they compare to, say, Digidesign's 192 converters or Apogee converters?

Thanks

I'm not sure if this should go in this forum or the Home Recording Forum.

I'm currently using a Delta 44 and am considering the LynxTwo "A" card.

Anyone with experience, thoughts or comments on these?

Thanks.

Hey everyone,

I'm new to this forum and this is my first post... I have a couple of questions, naturally...

Hi,

http://www.emu.com says

The E-MU® 1212M Digital Audio System delivers everything you need to produce audio on a PC with professional results - 24-bit/192kHz converters (the same A/D converters used in Digidesign®'s flagship Pro Tools® HD 192 I/O interface),

Hi all,

I'm a musician who is growing into the recording stuff, so I would like to ask for your advice on ADC .

Currently I use a Yamaha 02R, but I'm running out of channels and the ADDA extension card gives me level problems all the time : no synth seems to get more than -12 dB out of this card, so I'm pretty much limited to the 24 input channels with gain.

I presently have a 2 in/ 2 out sound card from emagic and I am looking around for an upgrade. I need an 8 in 8 out card lwith an external AD/DA converter ike the MOTU mk2/3 or the Aardvarkq10 etc etc. - the reason being, I'd like to record drums with a track per mic. (as you can imagine, trying to record drums on just two tracks is hard work)

I am sure we would all agree that the ideal signal path would be direct from Mic Pre to line in of the soundcard when recording to a DAW.

However I still need to monitor the Mic Pre source, so what I do like many others I suppose, is to go direct to my line in on my small mixer and take a direct line out of that to the soundcard.

what sounds better radar at 48k vs digi002 at 96k