I just bit the bullet and bought this plugin for my UAD card, and so far, I think I am in love! I am still trying to get my brain around all the ins and outs of it, but it looks like it is a really fine piece of work. I guess it is supposed to be an Oxford clone, but for the price (US$149), I don't see how that is possible.
Has anyone else picked this thing up? What is the general consensus on its functionality? How about comparisons to the Sony Oxford? Any tips on how to best use it (like the A/B/C algorythms on the high-shelf filter)?
Topic Tags
Comments
Yeah guys, sorry! You have to have a UAD card to try it. I guess
Yeah guys, sorry! You have to have a UAD card to try it. I guess I was directing my question to anyone with a UAD card...thanks for trying anyway, and sorry for the false alarm!!!
I've been playing with this thing for about 2 days now, and I am extremely impressed! Wow!
i've got one. the cambridge completely smokes. especially if you
i've got one. the cambridge completely smokes. especially if you have nuendo 2.o. i use the type 3 for mastering, 1 or 2 for more drastic eq settings.
it's extreemly smooth and rich sounding. makes the waves sound insignifigant. also, check out the cs-1 eq, it's pretty damn good as well.
chris perra
GARY: Yeah, there are some UAD 3.1 issues, and I've had a few, b
GARY: Yeah, there are some UAD 3.1 issues, and I've had a few, but for the most part, they are not "show-stoppers" (but they are pretty damn inconvenient at times!).
I read through the UAD manual on the Cambridge, and understand the controls a bit more now (type I, II, and III, plus the shelving types A, B, and C), and I can see just how awesome this thing can be!!! And the sound...ahh...sweet! :)
CHRISPERRA: I have never been a big fan of the CS-1, although I have used it quite a bit. It sounds too sterile for my tastes, and I prefer the sound of the Waves RenEQ myself. I do resort to the CS-1 to save on CPU ticks, and for some things it works quite well.
Right now for EQ'ing, my top 3 are:
1) Cambridge EQ (UAD)
2) Pultec EQ (UAD)
3) Waves RenEQ
Great stuff!!!
i liked the waves stuff as well. the interface is much better th
i liked the waves stuff as well. the interface is much better than the cs-1. try this, set up an eq setting with the waves. then copy the settings exactly with the cs-1.
i was very surprized with the results.getting a nice eq setting for me is harder with the interface of the cs-1, i think more visually like the cambridge or waves.
but with matched settings i like the cs-1 better most of the time than the waves.
however, now that i have the cambridge i rarely use anything else
chris perra
I posted this in the "yer personal space" thread in the mixing f
I posted this in the "yer personal space" thread in the mixing forum. Its basicly my studio and everthing I own listed since I couldn't post a picture of my space cause I have no webspace to post it.
Protools HD3 Syatem w/ PT 6.1
Mac G4 w/ Syncmaster 171v monitor
Otari MX5050MKIII8
Harman/Kardon DC5300 Tape Deck
192 Digital I/O
Apogee AD-8000
Midi I/O
Universal Audio 2108
Universal Audio M-610
Manley ELOP
Mackie 1402 VLZ
EMU ESI-2000
Kurzweil PC2R
Boss DR-770
Fatar SL-880
Vestax PMC-05ProII Dj Mixer
Technics SL-1200 M3D
Boston Acoustic CR85 Bookshelf speakers
Yamaha VST-SW150 Sub
Adcom GFA 535L Amp
Adcom GFP 555II Pre-amp
Furman HD56 Headphone Distribution System
BLUE Cactus Tube Mic
BLUE Dragonfly
(2) AKG 414B-TLII
(2) AKG 451B
(2) SM-57
Audio Technica 4040
Rockman Distortion Box
Oh yeah and if anyone can help me out calibrating my tape deck, it wants a tone refernced to dbm not dbv which my oscillator outputs at. Should I run it through my mackie, get 0 on the meters and take into account that it outputs at +4, say if the calibration setting it wants is a 1k tone at -18 dbm, i'll get a -24 on my board and everything will be fine (to be precise I'll use the pk read in PT since me AD is calibrated) or am I off. Also my AD is calibrated to -14dbfs=0db and is set to recieve a +4 proffesional level, and the deck outputs at +4. Basicly i shoot a -18dbm signal into the ocs in on the deck, which then I crank the trims on each channel all trhe way up and adjust a pin on the back to make the output read at +4 and the VU at 0, since I don't own a voltmeter and they are to expensive for me to jump up and get I have to use the peak meter in PT to see where the output of the tape deck's at, since my AD is calibrated to -14dbfs=0db should I be looking for a -10 reading on the peak meter or a -14 reading on the peak meter to calibrate my tape deck for a +4 output reading. Starting in a mostly digitaly revised world regarding how you record, buying that tape deck is deffinatly a learning experience for me, you don't really think about these things when everything in your studio is referenced to the same scale and a professional level. Any help regarding this problem I'm having would be greatly apprecaited.
missilanious Here's what I tell most of the Apogee customers
missilanious
Here's what I tell most of the Apogee customers when they call in asking how to get a +4 signal into their gear for proper calibration when they don't have a test tone generator.
You can get any constant tone signal and put it into a pre amp and have the pre amp set so the meters are at 0. At that point the pre will send a +4 signal to whetever you need to calibrate.
I wouldn't trust the Mackie board for 0 level to be honest as the meters aren't truly an analog style...having a pre amp with analog VU meters is the best way to go as it's more acurate at that point.
HTH
Opus :D
yeah after reading alot over the weekend I've learned alot, yeah
yeah after reading alot over the weekend I've learned alot, yeah I already calibrated my AD and the tape deck getting 0 on the vu meters on my manley which outputs at 0dbvu=+4dbm, the main thing that was screwing up everything when I was calibrating was using the mackie, and the fact that the main outs I was using on the board didn't output as hot as the main outs on the back actaully 6db hotter on the outs on the back which output at +4dbu, so already right there everything was off, well anyway thanks but I already did everything, well atleast everythings calibrated and I learned a good deal.
I have a UAD-1 but I've held out for the exact reasons Opus has
I have a UAD-1 but I've held out for the exact reasons Opus has + I've been waiting for the next recording project to try out the Cambridge. I figure I might as well get the best use out of it's trial period. I'll probably buy it if it impresses me or I find I can't live without it. I played around with the Oxford briefly at the NAMM show. Sony also has a hardware convolution reverb box that costs an arm and a leg. Surprisingly the sales rep had never heard of SIR and he looked a little concerned when I explained how it was a free plugin that everyone was downloading. lol
How much resources does the Cambridge EQ use of a UAD card? In
How much resources does the Cambridge EQ use of a UAD card? In other words, how many EQ's can you run on one card ?
For what it's worth, my UAD card has been running without issues and at minimum latency since day one on my (quite cheap) ECS/AMD combination. Remarkably enough also without interference from my TC Powercore and the RME Hammerfall card. For some funny reason the stuff just works ;) ...
MisterBlue.
Originally posted by thedug: I have the cambridge. Mackie gave
Originally posted by thedug:
I have the cambridge. Mackie gave to existing customers for $80.00! I couldn't resist at that price. I really like it. I have even used it on the 2-Bus!If you install 3.10 it comes with a demo of cambridge so you can check it out.
d./
$80??? How'd you get that deal??? I paid $149, and I have been a UAD-1 owner for over 2 years! Grrrrr.... :mad: Hehe...
I am not really complaining, this thing is so sweet, it was easily worth the $149! (although $80 would have been even better!)
You are kidding me, right? There is nobody else here that has th
You are kidding me, right? There is nobody else here that has the Cambridge EQ??? How about the demo? Has anybody tried the demo???