Hi everyone,
I was just wondering if anyone has had any experience comparing the many different types of:
1. multitracking software
2. wave editing software
3. sequencing

Hi,

I've been reading these forums quite regularly and have learnt a great deal from you guys, and hope to continue to learn more from you guys.

So 16 bit DAT is all over. Recently I've been running my mixes onto 2 tracks on my RADAR and transfering them to computer to top and tail them before handing them to the client as 24 bit WAV files. Mastering engineers seem to be happy with that. Is that the best current format?

Hi I have a question.
I'm using Logic, and Pro Tools on my Mac
Both are Good

What Programs are good to use in Windows Xp ?

Logic Has unlimted # of recordable tracks, and does not require any interface to work.

Pro Tools needs a interface 002, m-box, 001 etc.

I have just got a good deal on a G4 powerbook (1.6G, 1G ram, 80G HD) which I intend to use for live multitrack recordings. The only problem is all my software is for windows.

Exciting news.

http://www.weiss.ch/p2d/p2d.html

SARACON - sampling rate conversion software for Windows ®
for PCM and DSD

Finally - the last Sampling Rate Converter you may ever need: SARACON from Weiss.

I was actually trying out as an easy way to send music to clients and perspective clients and I was pointed to a website that hosted the cracked versions of a large number of audio plugins/software. .I guess I am behind the times but why can't the industry stop it?

I guess that is where these fly by night places get their stuff.

I have a stand alone unit and i am planning to upgrade to computer recording. Ive read that the first step is to figure out which software your going to associate yourself with. Now price is a bit of an issue, but if its nessacary than i can manage. What are your guys' suggestions?. By the way I'm leaning towards PC because i dont own a Mac and havent used one since like 4th grade. Thanks.

Looking at all the growth in the effects plugins in the last 2 years, some of them are better than the hardware effects units, I was wondering if software compressors would meet with the quality of hardware compressors anytime soon. Do you think it's possible? If not, please tell me why.

I have Cubase SX3 and I wanted to sell it. Kept it on ebay. I listed my auction 2 times, each time for 7 days! Both times the price didn't meet my reserve price of around $400 which is close to half of retail. What is going on? Don't people buy software anymore? Or does Cubase SX have not-so-good reputation?